He that is first in his own cause
seemeth just; but his neighbour
cometh and searcheth him.
(Proverbs 18:17 [KJV])
He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
(Proverbs 18:13 [KJV]
Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof. (Proverbs 18:21 [KJV])
Now that we in America officially have a "Ministry of Truth" and we have seen the government prosecute doctors for giving their patients medical information that the government does not approve of and has allowed big tech companies to become monopolies and violate RICO laws. Big Tech conspired against political opposition and silenced voices of truth while allowed protection from lawsuits. They claim to be conduits of free speech and not publishers and yet they have banned people and speech! They are indeed publishers determining what can and cannot be published. Their actions violate every principle and purpose of election and lobby law and they have committed treason.
Now a leftist judge has ruled against Donald Trump, ignoring these issues declaring that big tech can do as they please because they are "private companies". Really? So these powerful monopolies can discriminate against who they will even though a lowly unknown baker cannot be allowed to refuse to participate in a same sex marriage but must be forced to bake a cake decorated with two grooms and violate their deeply held religious beliefs in doing so? The courts and law have long left the plantation and decide every judge as he will. Judges even gag one side (traditional or conservative always) while the other side of the issue has full reign to demonize and try individuals in the media.
The Bible says that a person might seem right when you hear one side of the story but then the other side tells it's side it changes the whole thing. This is important in every dispute but so much the more when it comes to involving our nation in war. Lives, properties and rights are involved. The Bible tells us that life and death are in the power of the tongue and that is why the fight against propaganda and censorship is so vitally important.
WAR IN UKRAINE
The western media and governments are experts in disinformation. They make the old Soviet propaganda regime look clumsy in comparison. They have been at it for decades and big media has conspired to hide what is truth while giving a narrative or what they call "their version of truth but there is only one version of truth and sometimes neither side has it.
Thus it is in war.
We have good reason to distrust news coming from Russia. Censorship under the Soviet regime was nearly total and to expect a nation to go from that mentality to absolute freedom of the press in a couple of decades is a fantasy. Russia censors, we know they censor and the people of Russia know they censor. Do they use propaganda? Probably but what the western media is calling Russian disinformation today is not disinformation at all and that makes it very difficult for me to believe anything in the Western media.
To provide one's rationale for one's actions is not automatically disinformation. This is where discussion is so important and hearing out both sides and comparing it to veritable truth and what is known and established, especially if in prior years all sides recognized it to be true.
The message the people of the US have heard from media is that Russia has invaded the peace loving, innocent people of Ukraine... a nation that is the model of democracy, justice and truth and that this invasion came out of nowhere except for a madman named Putin who wants to restore the old communist Soviet Union and needs to do it fast because he is dying of cancer and has Alzheimer s and needs to make his mark on the world and someone needs to assassinate him because he is holding the entire nation of Russia hostage to his evil plans. They have drummed into the American psyche that Putin is a thug, murderer and madman.
Russia has a different story.
In peace talks with the United States as Russia was agreeing to dismantle the Soviet Union, James Baker assured Russia that NATO would not expand one inch eastward.
NATO- the North Atlantic Treaty Organization according to the Council of Foreign Relations website was: "Founded in 1949 as a bulwark against Soviet aggression"
NATO WAS FOUNDED AS A COALITION OF NATIONS THAT VIEWED THE SOVIET UNION AS AN ENEMY STATE.
So if the Soviet Union disbanded why didn't Nato?
Disbanding Nato was out of the question for the Nato aligned nations so Russia wanted assurances that Nato would not expand eastward towards Russia. US Secretary of State Jim Baker assured Russia that Nato would not expand "one inch eastward".
Russia did not want an empire that saw them as an enemy to surround them on their borders putting in missiles and US armaments and military installations.
That seems understandable.
Surely if Russia or China or North Korea or Pakistan or Iran or any number of nations decided to put missiles on the US Canada or Mexican border and build military bases there the United States would oppose it and take military action to prevent it.
Look at the expansion of Nato since 1990. Notice that Nato is snugging itself right up to the border of Russia.
If Ukraine joins Nato Russia is cut off and surrounded by nations that consider Russia enemy number one. Nato uses their military might as an economic wedge- using economic warfare to try and destroy Russia while pretending that Russia is the aggressor. Russia has rich resources that Europe needs and was building a pipeline for that purpose but the US has said no. Who is Nato to govern the free flow of trade from other countries?
The US instead wants fuel shipped from America to Europe and at the same time ship fuel from the middle east to America...can anyone say stupidity? Where are the global warming and environmental people on this one?
Russia's patient warnings go unheeded
Putin has issued warnings for the last 8 years that Ukraine becoming a Nato nation is a "red line." In other words a line that if crossed means war. Why? Because according to the Nato treaty if one Nato nation has a war all Nato nations will fight with it as one.
That means if any of these nations now bordering Russia has a dispute with Russia the Russians would have little recourse because anything seen as an armed conflict- even a false flag will bring an automatic NATO war against Russia. Nato has put a headlock on Russia, using it's military alliance for economic blackmail. The US uses NATO military might to prop up the "petro-dollar" and by doing keep the people of Russia in poverty in hope of a domestic uprising to overthrow the Russian government in a color revolution.
NOW FOR THE REST OF THE STORY
Since 2005 the deep state has used the Ukraine like a plaything instituting what Stratfor called the most blatant coup in history led by the US deepstate and other foreign actors and the US hasn't left the leadership of Ukraine alone since.
The government of Yanukovych that resulted from this orange revolution double crossed the US and NATO by refusing to sign an agreement with the European Union and sought trade with Russia instead. This brought about what is known as the Euromaiden revolution, another deep state funded and engineered revolt that lit the capital Kiev on fire killing one hundred people and bringing armed militants (from around the world) to storm the presidents palace to assassinate him. The riddled his convoy with bullets but the convoy was a decoy. The elected president of Ukraine had been airlifted out.
This clip from Stuart Bramhall explains it best.
"When Yanukovych turned to Russia instead for financial support, the US-backed fascist groups began a campaign of “peaceful protests” in Kiev’s Maidan. As happens with many US-sponsored color revolutions, fascist and neo-Nazi instigators quickly escalated their nonviolent protests into violent attacks against police and government officials with rocks, bats, metal bars, Molotov cocktails and bulldozers.
With the help of three EU leaders, government officials negotiated a truce with opposition leaders, which the violent protestors refused to to honor. After being informed by Ukrainian intelligence that mercenaries had been hired to assassinate him, Yanukovich sought asylum in Russia. Violent protestors immediately occupied Yanukovich’s home and public office.
Although a parliamentary proposal to remove Yanukovich from the presidency lost by 68 votes, the US immediately recognized the head of the Ukrainian parliament as the new president.
A leaked phone conversation between Victoria Nuland, the lead US diplomat during the Ukraine crisis, confirms direct US involvement in the 2014 coup. During the call, Nuland is heard instructing coup leaders on US choices to form the new government.
WESTERN MEDIA LIES ABOUT CRIMEA INVASION
While western powers and media not only instigated these coups in Ukraine but admittedly hand selected their puppet government in 2014 they have refused to recognize the legitimacy of the uprising in Crimea that happened in response to this obvious US led coup. The people of Crimea rose up and kicked out their Ukrainian puppet government without violence or bloodshed and quickly held a referendum of the people. Crimea had a 90 percent voter turn out for this referendum to leave Ukraine and the vote was 96.77% in favor of leaving Ukraine and rejoining as a Republic of Russia.
TWO OTHER REPUBLICS REPUDIATE THE US PICKED GOVERNMENT IN KIEV
Besides Crimea, two other regions bordering Russia held referendums on declaring independence from Kiev's puppet government. Luhansk and Donetsk voted overwhelmingly (90%) to withdraw from Ukraine and be independent republics.
The US, NATO and Kiev refused to accept this withdrawl by the democratic elections of the people instead declaring them terrorist operations.
Since then, the Ukraine military led by NAZI units have waged a terrible war against these regions killing 14,000 men, women and children as they shell homes, businesses, schools and hospitals. Leaders of Ukraine's military have referred to the people of Donbas (who are nearly all Russian) as dogs and less than human.
Western media tried to pretend that these NAZI battalions were a myth but their own words have come to haunt them as the US in 2018 voted along both party lines not to supply arms to the Nazi battalions in Ukraine. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/380483-congress-bans-arms-to-controversial-ukrainian-militia-linked-to-neo-nazis/
To most Americans knowledge the Nazi's killed mostly Jews but the real enemy of the Nazi's were Russians. 27 million civilians and soldiers of the Soviet Union died in that war. (This included Ukrainians as the Ukraine was one of the founding states of the Soviet Union)
While Americans like to take credit for the defeat of Hitler it was the Soviet Union's army that caused Hitlers downfall.
This is just a small bit of a complex history of Russia and Ukraine
If you have stayed with me so far perhaps you dismiss this as Russian disinformation but I ask you, if any of this is true does it impact your view of the war at all?
What if I told you that the US was threatening last November to put military bases in the Ukraine and some nations claim they already had. Would you consider this a provocation to war? https://thenewsglory.com/the-us-called-the-possible-establishment-of-bases-in-ukraine-an-unnecessary-provocation/
US SECRETLY BUILDING MILITARY BASES IN UKRAINE
On top of all of this Russia contended that the United States military had Bio-weapon labs in the Ukraine which the US denied. When Russia invaded they went directly to capture some of those labs. Now the US has been forced to admit that it was funding dangerous Biolabs in Ukraine, some THIRTY of them. Russia has taken evidence to the UN, proof that the United States was working on viruses tailored to infect certain Russian people and the ability to spread these viruses into Russia along migratory routes of birds. https://stanislavs.org/russian-defence-ministry-us-biolabs-studied-the-possibility-of-virus-transfer-by-birds-migrating-to-russia-study-of-bat-coronavirus/
US PUTS THOUSANDS OF NATO TROOPS IN UKRAINE IN SEPTEMBER 2021 AND PLACES UKRAINE'S ARMY UNDER NATO COMMAND LEADING RUSSIA TO BUILD UP TROOPS ALONG IT'S BORDER WITH UKRAINE IN RESPONSE https://www.army.mil/article/250444/us_nato_ukraine_enhance_interoperability_with_rapid_trident_exercise
US SECRETLY BUILDS AND FUNDS WUHAN TYPE BIO-WEAPON LABS IN UKRAINE
Report: US has 336 Biolabs in 30 countries including 26 in Ukraine
https://www.opindia.com/2022/03/us-has-336-biolabs-in-30-countries-including-26-in-ukraine-alleges-china/
Considering these things do you think Russia might have a reason to invade?
The Scriptures warn us we need to hear both sides before coming to any conclusion and yet the opposing view on this conflict is being censored or ignored in Western media. What are they afraid of? Why shouldn't we know these things? Just because this information supports the Russian position it does not make it propaganda. To call it such is itself propaganda and untrue.
IF YOU WANT MORE LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT CONSIDER WATCHING OLIVER STONE'S DOCUMENTARY FROM SOME YEARS AGO - UKRAINE ON FIRE
Comments